You are here

Reviews

Midterm.us

Editor's Rating:

We highly suggest for a major improvement on the customer support system. How hard it is to reply in a prompt and polite manner to a customer? You need our trust in order for your website to survive operating. Also, take a look at your writers. Maybe the administrator needs to reevaluate their writing skills. Because as far as quality writing is concern, what the writer gave us is way below sub-standard.

MastersThesisWriting.com

Editor's Rating:

Considering the price we paid for the order, we deserved a better paper. That is one reason why we did not like this website at all. Customer support feature is complete waste of time, as all options seemed futile. The customer representatives are impolite and lack professionalism. The writers better upgrade their skill set. The paper they delivered to us lacks high quality, something they promised from the very beginning.

MasterPapers.com

Editor's Rating:

The price does not match the quality of writing contained in the final paper. Professionalism of the staff including the administrator, customer support representatives and the writer needs to be improved. We do not recommend using their services on a regular basis because the costs are steep and writing of quality is poor- not really worthy of an investment at all.

MA-Dissertations.com

Editor's Rating:

As their website claims, they provide academic assistance to different branches of discipline at any level. We found out that this is not true. Their writers do not apt to handle Master’s level writing assignments. They need to hire better writers in order to improve the quality of writing their site has to offer.

Custom-Writing.org

Editor's Rating:

We have several reasons why we did not like this website. The customer support representatives and their attitude in communicating with clients are very disappointing. Their customer support system is another disappointing element.  None of the options works properly, defeating the purpose of this feature. The quality of their writing is sub-standard basing on the number of revisions that had to be made.

Pages