User reviews

Zerrin Nov 14, 2021

The writer self is responsible and replies messages in time, and makes the revision very quickly. But the quality of the paper can't be flattered. The writer can not understand the instruction after many times explanations, and still not have the capacity of delivering the perfect paper.

Osama Nov 14, 2021

This needs to be read out loud, It is very choppy and needs some rework.

Ji hoon Nov 14, 2021

Did not follow the guidelines of the assignment and failed to respond when asked to revised.

Lorena Nov 14, 2021

Not as expected a lot of grammar mistakes even after I asked to change !

Jennifer Nov 13, 2021

Good job . Thank you

Michele C. Nov 13, 2021

Horrible didn't turn in correct work

Jim C. Nov 13, 2021

The writer was not cooperative during the work.. he/she did not answer the questions/ do the research properly and is very rude. (calling me a liar) I would like to place the same order with another writer.. and also he/she exceeded the deadline by 4 hours and also not delivering whatever is needed. I would like another writer to do it.

Aygul A. Nov 13, 2021

He never came back.

Coltin B. Nov 13, 2021

Good start, but lacking story in your analysis. Such problems should always start with a goal question. It becomes easy to analyze the problem then onwards by tying a story around product, position, price p.o.v.

Amy H. Nov 13, 2021

Writer did not follow the guideline requested for paper. He or She wrote in biography format and the instrustions clearly stated that the paper could not be written in that type of format. I asked for a revision and got basically the same paper and no response back from writer.