User reviews
Prices
Quality
Delivery
Support
Myrick L. Jan 12, 2022
When I told him to revise the writer refuse and asked me to place a new order.
Was this review helpful?
(0 helpful votes)
Prices
Quality
Delivery
Support
Tiffany T. Jan 11, 2022
Very repetitive, the rewrite was better however I had already paid a different writter.
Was this review helpful?
(4 helpful votes)
Prices
Quality
Delivery
Support
Undrea Jan 11, 2022
Work was not what I originally asked for.
Was this review helpful?
(0 helpful votes)
Prices
Quality
Delivery
Support
Cindy P. Jan 11, 2022
Weak content quality and many grammar and spelling issues
Was this review helpful?
(2 helpful votes)
Prices
Quality
Delivery
Support
Aymee Jan 11, 2022
The quality of the paper was fine and he did fix some stuff but he didn’t give me a literature review like I asked. He also didn’t respond in a timely matter. He would just read my message and didn't reply. And lastly he used Wikipedia on academic research paper.
Was this review helpful?
(0 helpful votes)
Prices
Quality
Delivery
Support
Nikola Jan 11, 2022
As always, has gone above and beyond in what I need, this is why I keep coming back.
Was this review helpful?
(4 helpful votes)
Prices
Quality
Delivery
Support
Porscha Jan 11, 2022
Paper had little to do with evidence
Was this review helpful?
(0 helpful votes)
Prices
Quality
Delivery
Support
Abimbola A. Jan 11, 2022
I just feel like the writer met my needs
Was this review helpful?
(3 helpful votes)
Prices
Quality
Delivery
Support
William Jan 11, 2022
He is very unprofessional. Claimed to be knowledgable in during treatment plans and didn't have a clue. All talk and action. Do not use him at all. Those ratings is fake and the number of papers he completed is incorrect. He tells you to rate him a 10 which is not a true rating.
Was this review helpful?
(2 helpful votes)
Prices
Quality
Delivery
Support
Carol L. Jan 11, 2022
I was very disappointed with the quality of work. I gave a paper to be rewritten, gave the references and the rubric. I was making a powerpoint from the paper submitted to me and found many mistakes.
Was this review helpful?
(4 helpful votes)