User reviews

Cameron M.

The methods elements carries 35% of the marks and yet there is very little here. It is very poor technique to give so little attention to the subject matter of the module. Irrespective of whether or not this is a pass the work does not show a real understanding of methodology and you must ensure that there is an appropriate section in the dissertation. What is here tells me nothing. You re-introduce the Uk but th...

Luis S.

Extremely poor standard of work for a University level paper. Arguments were generic, lacking depth and critical thinking, with sweeping statements and poor logical construction. The question was not clearly defined, isolated and answered to a level that would be expected. Very amateur work - the writer was unable to see how the overall quality of the work needed improvement, and therefore the order had to be canceled.

Mai

poor writing qualities

Cynthia G.

not relate to what i want

Sherena

Was friendly and tried their best but did not deliver what was expected. Did not follow instructions.

Hyun C.

this writer did not complete the assignment as asked the first time. i asked that there was an retorical analist attached to the paper for which i did not receive the first time. i had to pay a second time for the writer to complete the assignment.

Samantha

I gave him a due date, and he kept brushing me off. He kept telling me he’s almost done and even after the given time I gave him he wasn’t done and kept saying the same thing over and over again. Very disappointed

Vickie L.

You didn't mention any key themes!

Barbara S.

I DONT LIKE IT

Maggie

There are several grammar mistakes and the wrong referencing style was used. When asked to correct it, I was ignored