User reviews

Luis U. Mar 06, 2025

Frustratingly after double and triple checking with writer prior to selecting her as the writer that this paper was within her remit she has now said that it is too technical and requires a new writer

Donna Mar 06, 2025

The writer would not directly address any of the issues I raised as concerns.He was untimely in aiding my requests.The writer had many grammatical errors, run-on sentences and confusing wording. I would NOT recommend this writer to ANYONE. Unhelpful with concerns and unwilling to make corrections. The writer accomplished the task technically, but not in a way that is worth paying for.VERY disappointed.

Blake Mar 05, 2025

I am looking forward to communicating with the writer but she doesn't really reply and revise. The most important is that didnt' meet requirement  and late for revision

April Mar 05, 2025

The writer is writing wrong things

Zahid A. Mar 05, 2025

Some of the wording doesn't make sense. May have to restructure the sentences.

Juan C. Mar 05, 2025

This was my first experience and it was the worst! The writer did not follow directions, it seems like it was an old paper that they already wrote that they tried to mesh into a new topic, we spoke about it, promised to fix, said it was no problem. asked for extra time, then stopped responding to me me. I was willing to work with the writer, and waited to hear back, The most unprofessional experience. I asked if he could deliver with the edits and writer said yes, only to leave me in a bind and stop responding.

Said P. Mar 05, 2025

This writers first language clearly isn't English, nor has she ever wrote a personal statement. I am disappointed.

Ana Mar 05, 2025

Bad work, didn't even use Excel

Phalen L. Mar 05, 2025

Just want to have a double check to make sure there is no plagarism. I need to hand it in on a safe assign program and cannot have plagarism.

Darlene S. Mar 05, 2025

Was not able to fix it in time, the addition he made were so off topic, initially i thought it was good material but there was not enough relevant substance to be paid 40$