User reviews
Prices
Quality
Delivery
Support
Mohd B. Jan 24, 2025
The depth and detail is not enough. Need to analyze the deeper meaning of the advertisements and relate them to the 2 key terms - the explanations are very superficial and not sociological.
Was this review helpful?
(3 helpful votes)
Prices
Quality
Delivery
Support
Jonathan Y. Jan 23, 2025
When she was done, I checked the paper with plagiarism checker and founded plagiarism in the paper. Therefore, I told her to edit the part. Then she fixed it, but if I did not check, it would be submitted with plagiarism.
Was this review helpful?
(0 helpful votes)
Prices
Quality
Delivery
Support
Xing xing Jan 23, 2025
work was just a description of a course and not a personal statement.
Was this review helpful?
(3 helpful votes)
Prices
Quality
Delivery
Support
Zhenyue Jan 23, 2025
The work was no complete
Was this review helpful?
(2 helpful votes)
Prices
Quality
Delivery
Support
Alfred Jan 23, 2025
Did not follow the instruction. Did not read the required material. Do not have any qualified analysis.
Was this review helpful?
(2 helpful votes)
Prices
Quality
Delivery
Support
Alla Jan 23, 2025
I wasn't able to use what he wrote. I found it lacking in content presentation. Im sorry but it didn't come up with my expectations.
Was this review helpful?
(1 helpful votes)
Prices
Quality
Delivery
Support
Abdul S. Jan 23, 2025
Not a good PPT
Was this review helpful?
(0 helpful votes)
Prices
Quality
Delivery
Support
Janette A. Jan 23, 2025
does not look like a study guide but rather an essay. examples were shown but not followed.
Was this review helpful?
(2 helpful votes)
Prices
Quality
Delivery
Support
Luis T. Jan 23, 2025
Not my expected paper.
Was this review helpful?
(2 helpful votes)
Prices
Quality
Delivery
Support
Sean J. Jan 23, 2025
I order a powerpoint presentation instead i got it in word a i pick "powerpoint"
Was this review helpful?
(2 helpful votes)