User reviews

CustomAssignment.com

1.8

Prices

Quality

Delivery

Support

Nia Oct 01, 2023

Did most of the work but: Poor communication, not following the exact instructions and late in finishing up the work.

Was this review helpful?

(1 helpful votes)

SmartEssayWriters.co.uk

1.3

Prices

Quality

Delivery

Support

Nathan M. Oct 01, 2023

doesnt reply chat and doesnt keep promises really risky...

Was this review helpful?

(0 helpful votes)

EduBirdies.org

3.0

Prices

Quality

Delivery

Support

Qing L. Oct 01, 2023

pretending that she can do it be she couldn't

Was this review helpful?

(4 helpful votes)

GuruDissertation.net

2.0

Prices

Quality

Delivery

Support

Zhong Oct 01, 2023

Do NOT pick this writer for literature assignments, the effort and communication was poor. I had to do the whole assignment by myself, please be careful,  this writer did not provide high-quality work.

Was this review helpful?

(0 helpful votes)

PrimeDissertations.com

5.0

Prices

Quality

Delivery

Support

Nathan Oct 01, 2023

Thanks!!!

Was this review helpful?

(4 helpful votes)

AcademicAssignment.com

2.0

Prices

Quality

Delivery

Support

Tracy Oct 01, 2023

she did not finish what I want in the same time and she did not follow the rules. I do not recommend this writer.

Was this review helpful?

(0 helpful votes)

NinjaEssays.us

2.3

Prices

Quality

Delivery

Support

Keith Oct 01, 2023

Paper was 2 hrs after deadline and basically written straight from pieces of the article

Was this review helpful?

(4 helpful votes)

Wr1ter.com

2.3

Prices

Quality

Delivery

Support

Colin Oct 01, 2023

bad job horrible

Was this review helpful?

(0 helpful votes)

Essay-Writing-Place.com

1.8

Prices

Quality

Delivery

Support

Kia Sep 30, 2023

It wasn't completed by the deadline and the instructions for the assignment were not followed.

Was this review helpful?

(3 helpful votes)

ExpertEssaysWriters.com

3.3

Prices

Quality

Delivery

Support

Noreen S. Sep 30, 2023

The paper was a good place for me to start however I had to tweak it severally. The entire introduction was a mere copy and paste of an actual resource with no new information despite the source being cited. There were several grammatical errors, adding unnecessary content to the paper, he repeated certain sentences in different parts of the paper, and could have done better. Glad I had enough time to review.

Was this review helpful?

(2 helpful votes)