User reviews

Anne B. Aug 23, 2023

Very brief paper that falls short of assigment objectives -- to develp a needs assessment tool that can reveal specific oral communication skills. Most questions don't pertain to oral communication skills, and none of the questions offer response options (multiple choice, ranking list, rating scale, etc.). It appears that assignment instructions were mostly ignored -- no title page, no justification for most questions, no response analysis section, no source citations, and no reference list. Composition somewhat awkward and confusing.

Orlando Aug 23, 2023

Didn't follow the exact instructions and made things more complicated. Didn't use examples. Probably used another source aside from the book because as the doctor read it, things were not clear and didn't refer to the book.

Su Aug 23, 2023

Some grammatical errors and redundancy.

Orville P. Aug 23, 2023

Work not completed appropriately and missed the deadline twice.

Abdo Aug 23, 2023

Got a 55% on the essay. Complete crap. Scored a 0/50 for grammar, punctuation, and spelling.

Charles K. Aug 23, 2023

Not clear explnation and hard to understand

Jaspreet Aug 23, 2023

Horrible communication. Writer left and never communicated to fix the issues.

Luis Aug 23, 2023

Writer has been offline and paper need revising asap.

Xinyue L. Aug 22, 2023

Did not follow the instructions

Bina J. Aug 22, 2023

Eam Meeting Agenda Outline: Please see comments within your paper. Not in outline form.