User reviews

Narayan Apr 05, 2023

did not complete on time

Ping-ting H. Apr 05, 2023

Poor copy paste paper...the writer should go and .....himself

Omar Apr 04, 2023

Could have included more discussion on game theory and economics and less technical features of both AMD and Intel products.

Joy L. Apr 04, 2023

Even the book name Through the Looking-glass differs every time throughout the paper.

Shane Apr 04, 2023

The assignment was not just to provide an annotated bibliography, but to also provide all the other answers that are in the assignment handout. Additionally, you were meant to cover all the sources for a particular week, so you are missing the Restakis reading, and you were meant to provide an external academic source as well.

Chia L. Apr 04, 2023

I'm so sad because I needed to spend hours on grammar correction. No logical flow. Did the work under the pressure. I would't recommend this writer for some important papers.

Cavadas Apr 04, 2023

The professor found many errors in the paper and i received a poor grade.

Amanda Apr 04, 2023

Writer provided wrong paper when instructions were clear.

Jacob A. Apr 04, 2023

Grammar was off and the paper consisted mainly of the annotated bibliography instead of the 1200 word requirement for the proposal. Overall the words was repetitive and it was a terrible paper that didn't flow.

Kevin Apr 04, 2023

She's good writer, but she wait until the last minute to finish your work. She made me have overdue date because she did't finish my work at time and I didn't even have time to review before I submitted my assignment because was late and I was running with time.