User reviews
Prices
Quality
Delivery
Support
Junwoo K. Aug 18, 2022
There was a lot of repetitive words and sentences. Some of the sentences were incomplete, or did not make any sense. There was also a lot of broken English.
Was this review helpful?
(5 helpful votes)
Prices
Quality
Delivery
Support
Debbie L. Aug 18, 2022
outline format is incorrect; missing Discussion of Findings.
Was this review helpful?
(0 helpful votes)
Prices
Quality
Delivery
Support
Hamza K. Aug 18, 2022
Finished very early on time but didn't reference the sources with the correct format. Furthermore, copying most of the info from a single source then putting too many references for fake sources to make it sound real. some grammatical mistakes.
Was this review helpful?
(0 helpful votes)
Prices
Quality
Delivery
Support
Mick Aug 18, 2022
Not what asked, I asked for edit, the writer rewrote the paper.
Was this review helpful?
(0 helpful votes)
Prices
Quality
Delivery
Support
Brian T. Aug 18, 2022
DO NOT LET HER BE YOUR WRITER. IVE BEEN ASKING FOR RESIVISION MANY TIMES FROM HER. And also, I just release the money because i want to make sure that the word counts for my paper is exactly what i had paid for and also to check for grammar. When i asked her for revision, she refused to work on my work and ask to make a new order. Lol unbelievable!
Was this review helpful?
(0 helpful votes)
Prices
Quality
Delivery
Support
Patrick Aug 17, 2022
The expert is good at his work but didn't meet my requirements and delayed in response many times ,because of this issue my project was delayed two weeks,next time make sure to meet the requirements and respond immediately
Was this review helpful?
(3 helpful votes)
Prices
Quality
Delivery
Support
Habib Z. Aug 17, 2022
The job had duplicate paragraphs, copy pasted, same paragraph of aprox. 60 words, writen exactly the same two times. The source used was supposed to be out of 3 books, no encyclopedias, which was not the case. Same superficial ideas repeated through the paper. Same sentences reapeated throughout the paper several times as if nobody will take notice?. Finished before time but with no use.
Was this review helpful?
(4 helpful votes)
Prices
Quality
Delivery
Support
Don Aug 17, 2022
Very brief paper that falls short of assigment objectives -- to develp a needs assessment tool that can reveal specific oral communication skills. Most questions don't pertain to oral communication skills, and none of the questions offer response options (multiple choice, ranking list, rating scale, etc.). It appears that assignment instructions were mostly ignored -- no title page, no justification for most questions, no response analysis section, no source citations, and no reference list. Composition somewhat awkward and confusing.
Was this review helpful?
(2 helpful votes)
Prices
Quality
Delivery
Support
Butti Aug 17, 2022
Today, my prof told me that this paper has copied another student's work. My course is failed and I am waiting the punish from school. That is too far!! How can you use others work in my paper? I even choose the VIP service!! That is what I pay for?? Is that how you work??
Was this review helpful?
(0 helpful votes)
Prices
Quality
Delivery
Support
Abdulrahman Aug 17, 2022
The writer confuses attachment therapy with attachment theory. What I am asking for is that the document I attached.
Was this review helpful?
(0 helpful votes)