User reviews
Prices
Quality
Delivery
Support
Chandra M. Jul 23, 2026
This paper is a trash and a complete waste of money. I ended up making a new order as paper was due in the next 5 hours. The writer didn't follow the instructions correctly. In fact, the Writer NEVER for once communicated from the beginning to the end of the paper.
Was this review helpful?
(2 helpful votes)
Prices
Quality
Delivery
Support
Peter Z. Jul 23, 2026
Not what I needed done, I ended up doing it by myself.
Was this review helpful?
(7 helpful votes)
ProfessionalEssayService.co.uk
Prices
Quality
Delivery
Support
Quenette M. Jul 23, 2026
Pleased with quality of work!!
Was this review helpful?
(0 helpful votes)
Prices
Quality
Delivery
Support
Bryan Jul 23, 2026
Unfortunately, the revised vision was not ready before the deadline.
Was this review helpful?
(0 helpful votes)
Prices
Quality
Delivery
Support
Coman Jul 23, 2026
Can't finish the assignment. After 5 days of nothing I contacted and that when I was informed the material wasn't clear enough. Should of known this was going to happen when I was asked for material.Poor communication. Unprofessional
Was this review helpful?
(5 helpful votes)
Prices
Quality
Delivery
Support
Yenifer R. Jul 23, 2026
The writing for this essay is absolutely terrible! I wish I could give him/her a 0. Sentences don't make any sense and the whole essay sounds like it was probably translated from some other language.
Was this review helpful?
(2 helpful votes)
Prices
Quality
Delivery
Support
Bashair Jul 22, 2026
You are wonderful!
Was this review helpful?
(1 helpful votes)
Prices
Quality
Delivery
Support
Brittany Jul 22, 2026
I was suspended due to plagiarism because she copied someone else's work online.
Was this review helpful?
(0 helpful votes)
Prices
Quality
Delivery
Support
Rich J. Jul 22, 2026
Way passed deadline
Was this review helpful?
(1 helpful votes)
Prices
Quality
Delivery
Support
Eliza Jul 22, 2026
He did not follow instructions. Failed to use any peer reviewed sources (minimum was 3 per instruction). Brought it to his attention. He removed all original reference entries used 4 new sources, only 2 of which were peer reviewed. Did not use any material from the new sources, instead just changed the intext citations from the originals to the new ones. Tried to clarify and told him to use the original, just find 3 PR sources, add new material from those sources and add the sources to the reference entry. He then adds the the 4 1st revision sources to the original reference list and fails to in cite text almost all of the cited work. The in text citations just say CITATION. Terrible writer and I'm not sure hes ever heard of a peer reviewed article.
Was this review helpful?
(0 helpful votes)