User reviews

Lexi H. Nov 14, 2022

I believe she could have done better if she was more knowledgeable about the field. She tries but I wasn't happy..

Reza Nov 14, 2022

Did not follow instructions and poor quality work.

Marko Nov 14, 2022

Had to have it rewrote and the final version still did not follow the directions in the order. English grammar and wording will need to be revised for proper function. Out of time for the order and cannot have them fix it another time. It'll be a good based for the final paper.

Lida Z. Nov 14, 2022

Worst experience I have had on this. Will never use this writer again. 4 days past deadline and 5 times of explaining the corrections to be made. Had to reach out to support. Writer did not read my instructions. I verified three times if they understood instructions in which they stated yes.

Austria Nov 14, 2022

Not in flow chart form but acceptable

Chelsea L. Nov 14, 2022

The writer has no experience in writing in the medical field. the content was not clear. I asked for correction and she did but again the problem was she doesn't understand what she writes. I didn't use it for sure.

Aisha Nov 13, 2022

This writer use the wrong readings, low quality work and totally waste my time.

Elena G. Nov 13, 2022

Writer has limited knowledge on this topic. No insight whatsoever! Missed deadline! I have no ill feeling towards the writer, Feedback is fair, based in fact.

Trevor S. Nov 13, 2022

Very bad writer. Had to request multiple revisions and I have also hired this writer for other orders and he has let me down immensely. Do not trust. Keep away from him at all costs.

Ernest M. Nov 13, 2022

He did not follow instructions. Failed to use any peer reviewed sources (minimum was 3 per instruction). Brought it to his attention. He removed all original reference entries used 4 new sources, only 2 of which were peer reviewed. Did not use any material from the new sources, instead just changed the intext citations from the originals to the new ones. Tried to clarify and told him to use the original, just find 3 PR sources, add new material from those sources and add the sources to the reference entry. He then adds the the 4 1st revision sources to the original reference list and fails to in cite text almost all of the cited work. The in text citations just say CITATION. Terrible writer and I'm not sure hes ever heard of a peer reviewed article.