User reviews
Prices
Quality
Delivery
Support
Mauricio S. Sep 03, 2025
The author has worked hard and researched the topic. I am unsure if her first language is English as there are a number of grammatical concerns, and a few colloquialisms, not appropriate for an academic work.
Was this review helpful?
(1 helpful votes)
Prices
Quality
Delivery
Support
Manos A. Sep 03, 2025
Good but not what i expected
Was this review helpful?
(3 helpful votes)
Prices
Quality
Delivery
Support
Max Sep 03, 2025
Absolutely awful turnaround! The paper was over 12 hours late! The writer only responded when urged by the support team, and not only was the writer resistant, the support team lacked the ability to engage the problem effectively! Very disappointed
Was this review helpful?
(1 helpful votes)
Prices
Quality
Delivery
Support
Hee-jung Sep 03, 2025
not satisfied with this order at all
Was this review helpful?
(0 helpful votes)
Prices
Quality
Delivery
Support
Marisol Sep 03, 2025
i didn't get the way i wanted
Was this review helpful?
(1 helpful votes)
Prices
Quality
Delivery
Support
Talal Sep 03, 2025
Didn't follow my instruction
Was this review helpful?
(0 helpful votes)
Prices
Quality
Delivery
Support
Dong keun Sep 03, 2025
I had to rewrite the essay because the instruction given was not followed.
Was this review helpful?
(2 helpful votes)
Prices
Quality
Delivery
Support
Nick B. Sep 02, 2025
worst writing does not follow instructions
Was this review helpful?
(2 helpful votes)
OnlineProofreadingServices.net
Prices
Quality
Delivery
Support
Sophie Sep 02, 2025
The writer submitted the assignment 4 hours late and did not complete the assignment. He asked for a 2 hour extension 45 minutes before the deadline! The assignment is still incomplete and he has not responded to any of my messages.
Was this review helpful?
(2 helpful votes)
Prices
Quality
Delivery
Support
Shirley Sep 02, 2025
1. the paper asks for analysis, writer provided a descriptive information, no analysis.2. the paper asks for emphasis on physics, chemistry or engineering involved. writer gave no such information, just plain descriptive text. irresponsive, and not making the correct changes as required.
Was this review helpful?
(3 helpful votes)