User reviews
Prices
Quality
Delivery
Support
Arletys May 02, 2024
DO NOT LET HER BE YOUR WRITER. IVE BEEN ASKING FOR RESIVISION MANY TIMES FROM HER. And also, I just release the money because i want to make sure that the word counts for my paper is exactly what i had paid for and also to check for grammar. When i asked her for revision, she refused to work on my work and ask to make a new order. Lol unbelievable!
Was this review helpful?
(0 helpful votes)
Prices
Quality
Delivery
Support
Susanna K. May 02, 2024
good I have to see first
Was this review helpful?
(1 helpful votes)
Prices
Quality
Delivery
Support
Kristine May 02, 2024
Already disscused with writer areas that need work.
Was this review helpful?
(0 helpful votes)
Prices
Quality
Delivery
Support
Shanaz W. May 02, 2024
Quality is good but work was delivered exactly 1 hour 55 minutes past the deadline. Extremely inconvenient.
Was this review helpful?
(0 helpful votes)
Prices
Quality
Delivery
Support
Sandy M. May 02, 2024
The writer didn't follow my instructions, ignored my messages and wrote a completely different paper than asked
Was this review helpful?
(0 helpful votes)
Prices
Quality
Delivery
Support
Laurie May 02, 2024
Missing part 3 - legal argument -likelihood and probability severity - controlling risk
Was this review helpful?
(0 helpful votes)
Prices
Quality
Delivery
Support
Dallan May 02, 2024
All of your writers do their best! I placed orders many times with different writers and every time I got high-quality writing pieces and always on time! You're my heroes! Thank you much!
Was this review helpful?
(8 helpful votes)
Prices
Quality
Delivery
Support
Kristen M. May 01, 2024
I sent the directions to the assignment that had clear instructions and still they did not to the assignment correctly
Was this review helpful?
(6 helpful votes)
Prices
Quality
Delivery
Support
Christopher I. May 01, 2024
Took too long
Was this review helpful?
(1 helpful votes)
Prices
Quality
Delivery
Support
Candra May 01, 2024
The paper was a good place for me to start however I had to tweak it severally. The entire introduction was a mere copy and paste of an actual resource with no new information despite the source being cited. There were several grammatical errors, adding unnecessary content to the paper, he repeated certain sentences in different parts of the paper, and could have done better. Glad I had enough time to review.
Was this review helpful?
(2 helpful votes)