UKAcademicWriters.co.uk review

Goodluck Aug 05, 2024

Did my assignment wrong not worth the 80 dollars.

Lucas L. Jun 21, 2024

Not happy with the final paper. See additional details for areas not covered from Rubric. Many items from Rubric Missing. Headers are incorrect.

Akash R. May 09, 2024

He wrote the paper twice which has nothing to do with my topic at all

Andrew Apr 12, 2024

i paid 40 bucks for two pages and got to stay up and fix the whole paper. what a waste.

Roy Mar 29, 2024

Everything is incorrect not what I asked for. Disappointed.

Pit T. Nov 22, 2023

Paper didnt follow my instructions

Christie W. Nov 16, 2023

did not meet the dead line

Mirga A. Mar 06, 2023

Did not follow simple directions. Way too many grammar issues!! Complete waste of money.

Anastasia S. Mar 04, 2023

I'm very dissapointed with this site and after service and everything

Maria Jan 06, 2023

Writer doesnt stay in contact with you at all. I try to reach writer for almost two days and no response. Also writer never completed work and for that work was never completed by deadline. Im writing this 6 hours after the deadline and still no response which now i have to cancel order.

Azam Jul 27, 2022

Not responding to people

Isvel Jul 06, 2022

communication was good correction were made, past deadline,

Raghu S. May 20, 2022

writer put a bid on a task that did not have the capacity to complete. please monitor writer bids so that they do not automatically bid on projects they cannot complete and waste the customers time.

Jessie C. May 16, 2022

this writer is not professional at all.

David S. Mar 21, 2022

Horrible, no instructions followed, I gave the writer everything needed for part 2. nothing was used I even asked you to use a specific source and then to add on it

Salai Z. Mar 15, 2022

Didn't write as per instructions given clearly.

Weih L. Dec 18, 2021

its very simple English in terms of sentencing, however the writer is patient when it comes of revision requests but even that wasn't met to my expectations. Harvard referencing is poor as well within the text.

Yasaman C. Dec 08, 2021

she did totally wrong

Joe L. Jun 29, 2021

Only got 58/100, here is the feedback from TA.Mastery. (28/40) Clarity, care, and detail. (20/40) Writing. (10/20) Mastery: What do you mean by Popper's attempt is 'full of skepticism'. Also not sure where the notion of falsification is discussed - 'extrapolating experiences to other conditions' seems like induction. Clarity: Lots of unnecessary detail in here that dilute your argument - for instance, causation discussion not needed.

Ngan May 10, 2021

direction is totally wrong, so I will cancel, but the writer already try his best, he just cannot understand the requirement of the assignment.