User reviews

Peter Jan 24, 2025

Followed the instructions perfectly but I needed better sentences and response that sounded more deep and professional. Got a C , but thanks anyways

Candace A. Jan 24, 2025

He was given more than one chance to re-analyze the results and could not explain the results.

Anais M. Jan 24, 2025

I can not write about another person so to cause them harm. I wish no one harm; It is visible to read the requirements and what was written had nothing to do with the requirements.

Mohd B. Jan 24, 2025

The depth and detail is not enough. Need to analyze the deeper meaning of the advertisements and relate them to the 2 key terms - the explanations are very superficial and not sociological.

Jonathan Y. Jan 23, 2025

When she was done, I checked the paper with plagiarism checker and founded plagiarism in the paper. Therefore, I told her to edit the part. Then she fixed it, but if I did not check, it would be submitted with plagiarism.

Xing xing Jan 23, 2025

work was just a description of a course and not a personal statement.

Zhenyue Jan 23, 2025

The work was no complete

Alfred Jan 23, 2025

Did not follow the instruction. Did not read the required material. Do not have any qualified analysis.

Alla Jan 23, 2025

I wasn't able to use what he wrote. I found it lacking in content presentation. Im sorry but it didn't come up with my expectations.

Abdul S. Jan 23, 2025

Not a good PPT