User reviews
Prices
Quality
Delivery
Support
Gonza Jan 22, 2025
It is good and acceptable.
Was this review helpful?
(1 helpful votes)
Prices
Quality
Delivery
Support
Aurora Jan 22, 2025
Plagiarize Huawei official website
Was this review helpful?
(2 helpful votes)
Prices
Quality
Delivery
Support
Hussain A. Jan 22, 2025
work is not good, did not spend time on research...
Was this review helpful?
(2 helpful votes)
Prices
Quality
Delivery
Support
Lindsay G. Jan 22, 2025
This writer promised to make adjustments to the text and never did them! I told him multiple times when is my deadline and he texted back that i should not worry about missing the deadline. he never did any adjustments to the text!!!I worked for 3 hours to make comments on the paper and he complexly screwed me over. He just stopped replying to messages and never submitted the updated version.
Was this review helpful?
(3 helpful votes)
Prices
Quality
Delivery
Support
Yiqi W. Jan 22, 2025
Could be better
Was this review helpful?
(2 helpful votes)
Prices
Quality
Delivery
Support
Yi-ning L. Jan 22, 2025
Hello, without the sources the essay is more than 750 words and it must be 750 words exactly. may you please edit it for me
Was this review helpful?
(1 helpful votes)
Prices
Quality
Delivery
Support
Shaheed A. Jan 21, 2025
No recourse page or citations and word count is way below what I asked
Was this review helpful?
(0 helpful votes)
Prices
Quality
Delivery
Support
Mihai Jan 21, 2025
Still grammatical errors and no substance in the writing after one revision. Would be okay for an undergrad paper, but not grad level.
Was this review helpful?
(2 helpful votes)
Prices
Quality
Delivery
Support
Ermal B. Jan 21, 2025
What is the "Main Topic" heading?
Was this review helpful?
(2 helpful votes)
Prices
Quality
Delivery
Support
Marlena Jan 21, 2025
The writer was very quick with the task, and it looked as if everything was fine. But by taking a closer look to the text, I noticed that most of the references are kinda irrelevant to the sentence the writer was writing about, and seemed kinda random. Some of the facts I checked were completely false from scientific point of view, and the structure was lacking.
Was this review helpful?
(0 helpful votes)