User reviews
Prices
Quality
Delivery
Support
Gabriel Jun 04, 2023
The writer plagiarized much of my essay. Avoid!!
Was this review helpful?
(3 helpful votes)
Prices
Quality
Delivery
Support
Marwan E. Jun 04, 2023
not recommended- poor communication- Limited knowledge in accounting
Was this review helpful?
(2 helpful votes)
Prices
Quality
Delivery
Support
Martin Y. Jun 03, 2023
Low grade due to writer being so vague and not answer the questions asked in the instruction
Was this review helpful?
(2 helpful votes)
Prices
Quality
Delivery
Support
Howard Jun 03, 2023
low quality and not professional
Was this review helpful?
(4 helpful votes)
Prices
Quality
Delivery
Support
Ruben Jun 03, 2023
This is not high school level, I don't understand most of the words.
Was this review helpful?
(0 helpful votes)
Prices
Quality
Delivery
Support
Chirag P. Jun 03, 2023
Did not follow direction.
Was this review helpful?
(0 helpful votes)
Prices
Quality
Delivery
Support
Zang Jun 03, 2023
your work on the second question dose not meet my requirements. As you can see from the model answer I gave you in the file "question_2 instructions" the writer dose not go deeply as you did. The purpose of this question is not to talk about how to design or manufacture SoC!! It is about how to use the reliability tools and techniques to build a sustain reliability plan for SoC. You need to read carefully the model answers then do required changes on question 2.
Was this review helpful?
(2 helpful votes)
Prices
Quality
Delivery
Support
Parker T. Jun 03, 2023
Said that revised it but didn’t change anything
Was this review helpful?
(0 helpful votes)
Prices
Quality
Delivery
Support
Yamilka C. Jun 03, 2023
I got a 70% for this paper :(
Was this review helpful?
(0 helpful votes)
Prices
Quality
Delivery
Support
Uyen V. Jun 03, 2023
It was a poorly written paper, where I received an F due to several areas asked for not be included in the order.
Was this review helpful?
(1 helpful votes)