User reviews
Prices
Quality
Delivery
Support
Eunice B. Aug 24, 2023
Didn't follow provided instructions was supposed to be 6 pages only provided a brief summery on each topic
Was this review helpful?
(0 helpful votes)
Prices
Quality
Delivery
Support
Consuelo M. Aug 24, 2023
extremely bad , was rude and then when I addressed they tried to chill The work was improper but I didn’t feel like it
Was this review helpful?
(1 helpful votes)
Prices
Quality
Delivery
Support
Satyam Aug 24, 2023
Not finishing work on time!Always went online and cannot reach!Never update the customer!
Was this review helpful?
(2 helpful votes)
Prices
Quality
Delivery
Support
Mashhor Aug 24, 2023
The work did not contain sufficient level of legal analysis and tends to be general in its commentary.
Was this review helpful?
(0 helpful votes)
Prices
Quality
Delivery
Support
Manea A. Aug 24, 2023
The paper was super vague and repetitive. I asked for a revision and was given a worse paper than the first one. Sucks because she had over a week and waited till two days before its due.
Was this review helpful?
(0 helpful votes)
Prices
Quality
Delivery
Support
Krystal D. Aug 24, 2023
The work and speed was fine with frequent grammar mistakes. My 2 biggest issues with this expert are: He takes too many orders at once and then will take quite a while to respond or update yours.The second thing was he set a pretty good bid offer so i chose him. Then later he started saying how big the project is and how its alot of work THEN demanded more money... I never changed the initial instructions which he read before placing the bid. Only after i chose him did he want more money for the project.
Was this review helpful?
(2 helpful votes)
Prices
Quality
Delivery
Support
Zujie Aug 23, 2023
Work not in time
Was this review helpful?
(1 helpful votes)
Prices
Quality
Delivery
Support
Melvin Aug 23, 2023
TERRIBLE TERRIBLE! WILL NEVER use this writer again! The writer did not follow directions and communication was horrible!
Was this review helpful?
(0 helpful votes)
Prices
Quality
Delivery
Support
Anne B. Aug 23, 2023
Very brief paper that falls short of assigment objectives -- to develp a needs assessment tool that can reveal specific oral communication skills. Most questions don't pertain to oral communication skills, and none of the questions offer response options (multiple choice, ranking list, rating scale, etc.). It appears that assignment instructions were mostly ignored -- no title page, no justification for most questions, no response analysis section, no source citations, and no reference list. Composition somewhat awkward and confusing.
Was this review helpful?
(2 helpful votes)
Prices
Quality
Delivery
Support
Orlando Aug 23, 2023
Didn't follow the exact instructions and made things more complicated. Didn't use examples. Probably used another source aside from the book because as the doctor read it, things were not clear and didn't refer to the book.
Was this review helpful?
(0 helpful votes)