User reviews
Mujahid A. Jul 27, 2025
Writer did not complete order in time ...
Was this review helpful?
(3 helpful votes)
Valeriya A. Jul 27, 2025
The work did not contain sufficient level of legal analysis and tends to be general in its commentary.
Was this review helpful?
(0 helpful votes)
Gamal G. Jul 27, 2025
I didn’t understand some of the request sent to me by the writer
Was this review helpful?
(0 helpful votes)
Alyssa Jul 27, 2025
it was not explained correctly!
Was this review helpful?
(1 helpful votes)
Francisco Jul 27, 2025
He just ignored my message when I requested for a revision
Was this review helpful?
(2 helpful votes)
Taif Jul 27, 2025
Grammar was terrible.
Was this review helpful?
(5 helpful votes)
Hind A. Jul 27, 2025
it has been 12 hours since the writer said he would revise the paper.
Was this review helpful?
(0 helpful votes)
Hao Q. Jul 27, 2025
No response back I will reassign it to someone else
Was this review helpful?
(0 helpful votes)
Raj C. Jul 26, 2025
Actual research for "research paper' was lacking. Paper was repetitive, definitions of terms were used to fill entire pages instead of applying those terms to the concepts. The majority of the content is lifted from sources and pasted into the paper. I asked the writer to add detail to the core section of the paper and they added more definitions and lists to take of page space.
Was this review helpful?
(4 helpful votes)
Felicia Jul 26, 2025
Rewrite structure horrible uses of word choice
Was this review helpful?
(0 helpful votes)