User reviews
Candace A. Jan 24, 2025
He was given more than one chance to re-analyze the results and could not explain the results.
Was this review helpful?
(2 helpful votes)
Anais M. Jan 24, 2025
I can not write about another person so to cause them harm. I wish no one harm; It is visible to read the requirements and what was written had nothing to do with the requirements.
Was this review helpful?
(2 helpful votes)
Mohd B. Jan 24, 2025
The depth and detail is not enough. Need to analyze the deeper meaning of the advertisements and relate them to the 2 key terms - the explanations are very superficial and not sociological.
Was this review helpful?
(3 helpful votes)
Jonathan Y. Jan 23, 2025
When she was done, I checked the paper with plagiarism checker and founded plagiarism in the paper. Therefore, I told her to edit the part. Then she fixed it, but if I did not check, it would be submitted with plagiarism.
Was this review helpful?
(0 helpful votes)
Xing xing Jan 23, 2025
work was just a description of a course and not a personal statement.
Was this review helpful?
(3 helpful votes)
Zhenyue Jan 23, 2025
The work was no complete
Was this review helpful?
(2 helpful votes)
Alfred Jan 23, 2025
Did not follow the instruction. Did not read the required material. Do not have any qualified analysis.
Was this review helpful?
(2 helpful votes)
Alla Jan 23, 2025
I wasn't able to use what he wrote. I found it lacking in content presentation. Im sorry but it didn't come up with my expectations.
Was this review helpful?
(1 helpful votes)
Abdul S. Jan 23, 2025
Not a good PPT
Was this review helpful?
(0 helpful votes)
Janette A. Jan 23, 2025
does not look like a study guide but rather an essay. examples were shown but not followed.
Was this review helpful?
(2 helpful votes)